In our Rome to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model 3 Performance by 24 minutes, completing the 1301km route in 12h 41min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 41min (24 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 36min
- Energy: ~202 kWh
- Distance: 1301km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
| Travel time |
12h 41min |
13h 5min |
| Charging time: |
36min |
59min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~234 kWh |
~235 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Povegliano Est (11 min, 16% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (15 min, 13% → 71%)
- Arrival: Prague
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Arno Est (10 min, 47% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Povegliano Est (14 min, 15% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Raststätte Lanz - Brenner (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
MOL (10 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 24-minute advantage over Tesla Model 3 Performance on this 1301km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 36min vs 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~202 kWh vs ~230 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons