In our Rome to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron 55 by 141 minutes, completing the 2416km route in 25h 25min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 25min (141 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 32min
- Energy: ~394 kWh
- Distance: 2416km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron 55 |
| Travel time |
25h 25min |
27h 46min |
| Charging time: |
1h 32min |
3h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~435 kWh |
~436 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (13 min, 17% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Pizza Plus (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststation Föhrenberg (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (13 min, 11% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Factory Annopol (23 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (14 min, 28% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Adige Est (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (17 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Fella Est (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Tankstelle (20 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 6:
Raststation Föhrenberg (18 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 8:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 9:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (15 min, 13% → 54%)
-
Stop 10:
Zajazd Plan (21 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 11:
Zajazd Orchidea (30 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 12:
Jono Dailidės (22 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 13:
Neste Pasvalio (11 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 141-minute advantage over Audi e-tron 55 on this 2416km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 32min vs 3h 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~394 kWh vs ~595 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons