In our Rome to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 121 minutes, completing the 2416km route in 25h 25min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 14 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 25min (121 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 32min
- Energy: ~394 kWh
- Distance: 2416km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
25h 25min |
27h 26min |
| Charging time: |
1h 32min |
3h 17min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
14 |
| Energy used |
~435 kWh |
~436 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (13 min, 17% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Pizza Plus (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststation Föhrenberg (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (13 min, 11% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Factory Annopol (23 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (16 min, 13% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Fella Est (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Tankstelle Hirschstettner Straße (13 min, 11% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
MOL Kroměřížská (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
Moya (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 9:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 10:
Blue City (35 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 11:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 12:
Norfa XL (10 min, 11% → 21%)
-
Stop 13:
IONITY Circle K (12 min, 19% → 52%)
-
Stop 14:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 121-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2416km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 14 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 32min vs 3h 17min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~394 kWh vs ~447 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons