In our Rome to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 91 minutes, completing the 2420km route in 25h 55min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 9 charging stops compared to 14 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 55min (91 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 1h 52min
- Energy: ~444 kWh
- Distance: 2420km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
27h 26min |
25h 55min |
| Charging time: |
3h 17min |
1h 52min |
| Charging stops: |
14 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~436 kWh |
~437 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (16 min, 13% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Fella Est (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Tankstelle Hirschstettner Straße (13 min, 11% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
MOL Kroměřížská (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
Moya (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 9:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 10:
Blue City (35 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 11:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 12:
Norfa XL (10 min, 11% → 21%)
-
Stop 13:
IONITY Circle K (12 min, 19% → 52%)
-
Stop 14:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger AMIGO (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Factory Annopol (21 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 8:
Jono Dailidės (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Circle K Aplinkkelis (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 91-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2420km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 14 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 52min vs 3h 17min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~444 kWh vs ~448 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons