In our Rome to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the BMW iX1 eDrive20 by 103 minutes, completing the 1654km route in 16h 49min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 49min (103 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 12min
- Energy: ~270 kWh
- Distance: 1654km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
BMW iX1 eDrive20 |
| Travel time |
16h 49min |
18h 32min |
| Charging time: |
1h 12min |
2h 21min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~298 kWh |
~302 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shell (18 min, 15% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
BMW iX1 eDrive20 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (13 min, 31% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Adige Est (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (11 min, 11% → 26%)
-
Stop 5:
Petrol (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 9:
JP Putevi Srbije (21 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 10:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (22 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 103-minute advantage over BMW iX1 eDrive20 on this 1654km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 12min vs 2h 21min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~270 kWh vs ~279 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons