In our Rome to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX90 Single Motor by 66 minutes, completing the 1654km route in 16h 49min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 49min (66 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 12min
- Energy: ~270 kWh
- Distance: 1654km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Volvo EX90 Single Motor |
| Travel time |
16h 49min |
17h 55min |
| Charging time: |
1h 12min |
2h 11min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~298 kWh |
~301 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shell (18 min, 15% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Volvo EX90 Single Motor Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (20 min, 15% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Nord Est Mall (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Barje Jug (10 min, 17% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (29 min, 15% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 6:
JP Putevi Srbije (52 min, 15% → 91%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 66-minute advantage over Volvo EX90 Single Motor on this 1654km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 12min vs 2h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~270 kWh vs ~381 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons