In our Rome to Sofia EV duel, the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 49 minutes, completing the 1651km route in 16h 23min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric
- Total time: 16h 23min (49 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 52min
- Energy: ~285 kWh
- Distance: 1651km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
16h 23min |
17h 12min |
| Charging time: |
52min |
1h 20min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~297 kWh |
~298 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 31% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (12 min, 11% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Martinci (30 min, 10% → 84%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (16 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
JP Putevi Srbije (31 min, 18% → 88%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Won
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric achieved a 49-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1651km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 52min vs 1h 20min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~285 kWh vs ~303 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons