In our Rome to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 by 12 minutes, completing the 1673km route in 16h 49min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 49min (12 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 12min
- Energy: ~273 kWh
- Distance: 1673km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
17h 1min |
16h 49min |
| Charging time: |
1h 16min |
1h 12min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~301 kWh |
~298 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 15% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Nord Est Mall (13 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shell (11 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Martinci (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
JP Putevi Srbije (32 min, 17% → 97%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shell (18 min, 15% → 78%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV A1 (34 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 12-minute advantage over XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 on this 1673km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 12min vs 1h 16min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~273 kWh vs ~329 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons