In our Rome to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron by 56 minutes, completing the 2261km route in 23h 7min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 7min (56 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 25min
- Energy: ~369 kWh
- Distance: 2261km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron |
| Travel time |
23h 7min |
24h 3min |
| Charging time: |
1h 25min |
2h 6min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~407 kWh |
~408 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (13 min, 17% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Pizza Plus (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststation Föhrenberg (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (13 min, 11% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Factory Annopol (17 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 7:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 10% → 38%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Audi Q6 e-tron Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 37% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Adige Est (12 min, 20% → 69%)
-
Stop 3:
Electrip Le Valli Di Carnia (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Raststation Föhrenberg (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Olympia (10 min, 11% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Avion Shopping Park (11 min, 12% → 61%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Hotel Porto (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 9:
Factory Annopol (20 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 10:
Kaufland (22 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 56-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron on this 2261km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 25min vs 2h 6min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~369 kWh vs ~425 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons