In our Rome to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Lotus Eletre by 64 minutes, completing the 2261km route in 22h 59min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 59min (64 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 17min
- Energy: ~352 kWh
- Distance: 2261km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Lotus Eletre |
| Travel time |
22h 59min |
24h 3min |
| Charging time: |
1h 17min |
2h 9min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~407 kWh |
~407 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 22% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Pizza Plus (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststation Föhrenberg (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (11 min, 13% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
Factory Annopol (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 10% → 36%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Lotus Eletre Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 19% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (10 min, 11% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
Fella Est (10 min, 12% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell (10 min, 22% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Avion Shopping Park (12 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Hotel Porto (11 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 9:
Factory Annopol (24 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 10:
Kaufland (22 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 64-minute advantage over Lotus Eletre on this 2261km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 17min vs 2h 9min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~352 kWh vs ~509 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons