In our Rome to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 72 minutes, completing the 2261km route in 23h 31min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 31min (72 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 42min
- Energy: ~415 kWh
- Distance: 2261km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
24h 43min |
23h 31min |
| Charging time: |
2h 59min |
1h 42min |
| Charging stops: |
11 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~407 kWh |
~406 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (16 min, 13% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Fella Est (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Tankstelle Hirschstettner Straße (13 min, 11% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
MOL Kroměřížská (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
Moya (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 9:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (17 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 10:
Factory Annopol (29 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 11:
MOP Rudniki Południe (28 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (13 min, 18% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Electrip Le Valli Di Carnia (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger AMIGO (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Factory Annopol (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland (18 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 72-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2261km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 42min vs 2h 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~415 kWh vs ~419 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons