In our Rome to Warsaw EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model 3 SR Plus by 27 minutes, completing the 1756km route in 17h 36min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 36min (27 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 58min
- Energy: ~287 kWh
- Distance: 1756km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model 3 SR Plus |
| Travel time |
17h 36min |
18h 3min |
| Charging time: |
58min |
1h 21min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~316 kWh |
~317 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (13 min, 17% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Pizza Plus (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststation Föhrenberg (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (13 min, 11% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Tesla Model 3 SR Plus Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 12% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Fella Est (10 min, 12% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (11 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
MOL Kroměřížská (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 7:
Moya (10 min, 15% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 11% → 53%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 27-minute advantage over Tesla Model 3 SR Plus on this 1756km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 58min vs 1h 21min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~287 kWh vs ~328 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons