In our Rome to Warsaw EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the VW ID. Buzz Pro LR by 75 minutes, completing the 1759km route in 17h 51min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 51min (75 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 9min
- Energy: ~323 kWh
- Distance: 1759km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR |
| Travel time |
17h 51min |
19h 6min |
| Charging time: |
1h 9min |
2h 21min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~317 kWh |
~317 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (13 min, 18% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Electrip Le Valli Di Carnia (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger AMIGO (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (11 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (14 min, 34% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Adige Est (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (17 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Fella Est (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Raststation Kapfenberg Süd (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 7:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 9:
Tesco (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 10:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 11:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (14 min, 15% → 51%)
-
Stop 12:
Zajazd Plan (11 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 75-minute advantage over VW ID. Buzz Pro LR on this 1759km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 9min vs 2h 21min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~323 kWh vs ~389 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons