In our Rome to Warsaw EV duel, the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 95 by 80 minutes, completing the 1762km route in 18h 47min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 needs only 10 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170
- Total time: 18h 47min (80 min faster)
- Charging stops: 10
- Charging time: 2h 2min
- Energy: ~307 kWh
- Distance: 1762km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 95 |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 |
| Travel time |
20h 7min |
18h 47min |
| Charging time: |
3h 17min |
2h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
13 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~317 kWh |
~317 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 95 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Badia al Pino Est (10 min, 19% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Ristorante Goyo (20 min, 16% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
Adige Est (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (23 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 5:
Fella Est (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Raststation Kapfenberg Süd (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 10:
Tesco (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 11:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 12:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (21 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 13:
Zajazd Plan (15 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 26% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (12 min, 16% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (13 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Fella Est (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Raststation Kapfenberg Süd (10 min, 15% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Tankstelle Sterngasse (14 min, 12% → 61%)
-
Stop 8:
MOL Kroměřížská (12 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Moya (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 10:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (15 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 Won
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 170 achieved a 80-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 95 on this 1762km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 10 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 2min vs 3h 17min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons