In our Rome to Warsaw EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Performance beats the Vinfast VF9 by 39 minutes, completing the 1758km route in 18h 2min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Vinfast VF9's 475km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model 3 Performance's 424km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model 3 Performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Performance
- Total time: 18h 2min (39 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 20min
- Energy: ~311 kWh
- Distance: 1758km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
Vinfast VF9 |
| Travel time |
18h 2min |
18h 41min |
| Charging time: |
1h 20min |
1h 58min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~316 kWh |
~317 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 18% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (10 min, 13% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Fella Est (10 min, 15% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 22% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Olympia (10 min, 16% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Vinfast VF9 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (11 min, 17% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (14 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Fella Est (11 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Raststation Kapfenberg Süd (10 min, 13% → 38%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Tankstelle Sterngasse (15 min, 11% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
MOL Kroměřížská (13 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 8:
Moya (17 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 9:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (17 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Tesla Model 3 Performance Won
The Tesla Model 3 Performance achieved a 39-minute advantage over Vinfast VF9 on this 1758km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 20min vs 1h 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~311 kWh vs ~455 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons