In our Sofia to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 82 minutes, completing the 2114km route in 20h 49min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 49min (82 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 16min
- Energy: ~329 kWh
- Distance: 2114km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
20h 49min |
22h 11min |
| Charging time: |
1h 16min |
2h 19min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~381 kWh |
~382 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (12 min, 70% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (18 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Shopping City Seiersberg (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Donautal Ost (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Haidt Nord (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 57% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (20 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (16 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Emmezeta Jankomir (12 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tankstelle Shopping City Seiersberg (11 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
Turmöl Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Nord (12 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
Im Gewerbepark (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 10:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 11:
Rastplatz Helderloh (10 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 82-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2114km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 16min vs 2h 19min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~329 kWh vs ~473 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons