In our Sofia to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model X 2023 by 167 minutes, completing the 2121km route in 21h 28min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 28min (167 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 31min
- Energy: ~380 kWh
- Distance: 2121km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Tesla Model X 2023 |
| Travel time |
21h 28min |
24h 15min |
| Charging time: |
1h 31min |
3h 44min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~382 kWh |
~382 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV A1 (17 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Emmezeta Jankomir (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Tankstelle Shopping City Seiersberg (10 min, 19% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Mer McDonald's (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 8:
Aral Tankstelle Bergische Landstraße (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Tesla Model X 2023 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger IKEA (31 min, 17% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Odmorište Novska Sjever (21 min, 10% → 29%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Shell (14 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesla Supercharger (30 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 5:
Smatrics Pendlerparkplatz (31 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Tankstelle (31 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (33 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 8:
Aral Autohof Dachsberg (23 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 9:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 36%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 167-minute advantage over Tesla Model X 2023 on this 2121km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 31min vs 3h 44min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~380 kWh vs ~438 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons