In our Sofia to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Ford Mustang Mach-E ER by 96 minutes, completing the 1615km route in 16h 9min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 9min (96 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 51min
- Energy: ~264 kWh
- Distance: 1615km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Ford Mustang Mach-E ER |
| Travel time |
16h 9min |
17h 45min |
| Charging time: |
51min |
2h 21min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~291 kWh |
~291 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 25% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (11 min, 16% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
ČEZ Mikulášov sever (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Ford Mustang Mach-E ER Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 61% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Ledi MS (35 min, 11% → 70%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 4:
Páty Nord (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Győr (15 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Ladná směr Brno (10 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 7:
OC Karlov (15 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 8:
Burger King Kutnohorská (15 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 9:
Esso Tankstelle (21 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 96-minute advantage over Ford Mustang Mach-E ER on this 1615km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 51min vs 2h 21min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~264 kWh vs ~291 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons