In our Sofia to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 90 minutes, completing the 1615km route in 16h 8min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 8min (90 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 50min
- Energy: ~251 kWh
- Distance: 1615km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 8min |
17h 38min |
| Charging time: |
50min |
2h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~291 kWh |
~293 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 29% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
ČEZ Mikulášov sever (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle (10 min, 11% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (16 min, 49% → 84%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (36 min, 10% → 95%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
Páty Nord (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Győr (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Ladná směr Brno (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
ČEZ Mikulášov sever (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 8:
Novovysočanská (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Aral Tankstelle Werftstraße (20 min, 10% → 68%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 90-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1615km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 50min vs 2h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~251 kWh vs ~254 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons