In our Sofia to Berlin EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 22 minutes, completing the 1629km route in 17h 38min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 28, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+'s 340km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 9 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 17h 38min (22 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 25min
- Energy: ~257 kWh
- Distance: 1629km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
17h 38min |
18h 0min |
| Charging time: |
2h 25min |
2h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~293 kWh |
~293 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (16 min, 49% → 84%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (36 min, 10% → 95%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
Páty Nord (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Győr (15 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Ladná směr Brno (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
ČEZ Mikulášov sever (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 8:
Novovysočanská (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Aral Tankstelle Werftstraße (20 min, 10% → 68%)
- Arrival: Berlin
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 50% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV smer Beograd (32 min, 17% → 79%)
-
Stop 4:
Kecskemét északi (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Tópark (13 min, 13% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Mosonmagyaróvár Nord (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Ladná směr Brno (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 8:
OC Karlov (13 min, 14% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Kardausova DC (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 10:
SachsenEnergie City Center (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 11:
Rasthof Berstetal (10 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 22-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1629km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~257 kWh vs ~297 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons