In our Sofia to Berlin EV duel, the Tesla Model Y Long-Range beats the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor by 28 minutes, completing the 1615km route in 16h 23min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor's 470km range doesn't beat the Tesla Model Y Long-Range's 426km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model Y Long-Range
- Total time: 16h 23min (28 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 5min
- Energy: ~284 kWh
- Distance: 1615km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
| Travel time |
16h 23min |
16h 51min |
| Charging time: |
1h 5min |
1h 29min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~291 kWh |
~291 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (14 min, 19% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (18 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
ČEZ Mikulášov sever (13 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (26 min, 13% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (10 min, 11% → 39%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Lamačská cesta (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
OC Karlov (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Shell (10 min, 13% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Alten Mälzerei (12 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Tesla Model Y Long-Range Won
The Tesla Model Y Long-Range achieved a 28-minute advantage over Volvo EX90 Twin Motor on this 1615km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 5min vs 1h 29min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~284 kWh vs ~368 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons