In our Sofia to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the VW ID.3 Pro S 2023 by 57 minutes, completing the 1668km route in 17h 51min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 51min (57 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~272 kWh
- Distance: 1668km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
VW ID.3 Pro S 2023 |
| Travel time |
17h 51min |
18h 48min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
1h 30min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~300 kWh |
~300 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (17 min, 69% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (11 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Novate Nord (11 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Bern
VW ID.3 Pro S 2023 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
JP Putevi Srbije (15 min, 16% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Emmezeta Jankomir (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Barje Sever (14 min, 16% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Electra Via Carlo Cattaneo (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Centro Calzaturiero (11 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 57-minute advantage over VW ID.3 Pro S 2023 on this 1668km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 1h 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~272 kWh vs ~279 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons