In our Sofia to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Skoda ENYAQ 85 by 82 minutes, completing the 1668km route in 17h 42min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 42min (82 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 54min
- Energy: ~260 kWh
- Distance: 1668km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Skoda ENYAQ 85 |
| Travel time |
17h 42min |
19h 4min |
| Charging time: |
54min |
2h 5min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~300 kWh |
~300 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (12 min, 70% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (12 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Novate Nord (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Skoda ENYAQ 85 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 62% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (12 min, 19% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (25 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (21 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Fratta Nord (20 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Electriease Monte Alto Nord (11 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 7:
Free To X Villoresi Est (26 min, 10% → 69%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 82-minute advantage over Skoda ENYAQ 85 on this 1668km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 54min vs 2h 5min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~260 kWh vs ~292 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons