In our Sofia to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 37 minutes, completing the 957km route in 9h 24min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 24min (37 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~149 kWh
- Distance: 957km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
9h 24min |
10h 1min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
57min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~172 kWh |
~172 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 29% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 18% → 60%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 56% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (26 min, 12% → 82%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Páty Nord (11 min, 19% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 37-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 957km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 57min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~149 kWh vs ~164 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons