In our Sofia to Budapest EV duel, the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric beats the Audi e-tron GT by 38 minutes, completing the 763km route in 7h 33min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
Despite costing 34,060 less, the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric beats the Audi e-tron GT by 38 minutes on this route.
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric needs only 1 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric
- Total time: 7h 33min (38 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 10min
- Energy: ~132 kWh
- Distance: 763km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron GT |
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric |
| Travel time |
8h 11min |
7h 33min |
| Charging time: |
45min |
10min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
1 |
| Energy used |
~137 kWh |
~137 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 57% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (25 min, 11% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 37% → 69%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Won
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric achieved a 38-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 763km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 10min vs 45min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~132 kWh vs ~171 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons