In our Sofia to Helsinki EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 101 minutes, completing the 2500km route in 31h 50min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 14, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 31h 50min (101 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 48min
- Energy: ~408 kWh
- Distance: 2500km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
31h 50min |
33h 31min |
| Charging time: |
1h 48min |
3h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~450 kWh |
~449 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 25% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (12 min, 31% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (17 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (29 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Neste (10 min, 13% → 57%)
-
Stop 8:
Neste Niidu (10 min, 16% → 57%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 57% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (25 min, 11% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (16 min, 12% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland Wolkera (16 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell MOP East (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
Lakeside (32 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 9:
Kaufland (32 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 10:
Cafe Baltica (17 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 11:
Neste (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 12:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 12% → 50%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 101-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2500km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 48min vs 3h 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~408 kWh vs ~559 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons