In our Sofia to London EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 37 minutes, completing the 2438km route in 24h 43min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 43min (37 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 29min
- Energy: ~379 kWh
- Distance: 2438km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
24h 43min |
25h 20min |
| Charging time: |
1h 29min |
1h 58min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~439 kWh |
~440 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (12 min, 70% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (18 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Shopping City Seiersberg (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Donautal Ost (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Haidt Nord (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 7:
Lukoil Kortrijksesteenweg (13 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: London
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV A1 (38 min, 15% → 86%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Shell (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle Shopping City Seiersberg (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Smatrics Pendlerparkplatz (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Mer McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
PWC Rastanlage Kohlsberg Nord (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 8:
JBC (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 37-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2438km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 29min vs 1h 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~379 kWh vs ~448 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons