In our Sofia to Madrid EV duel, the VW ID.7 Pro S beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 13 minutes, completing the 2923km route in 30h 24min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 30, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The VW ID.7 Pro S needs only 9 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
VW ID.7 Pro S
- Total time: 30h 24min (13 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 18min
- Energy: ~443 kWh
- Distance: 2923km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
VW ID.7 Pro S |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
30h 24min |
30h 37min |
| Charging time: |
2h 18min |
2h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~526 kWh |
~527 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
VW ID.7 Pro S Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 70% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (13 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (22 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 5:
Area di Servizio Stura Ovest (15 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (20 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de Gasparets (17 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Vila Sana (15 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 9:
Zunder Avia (10 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV A1 (15 min, 15% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Roadhouse (12 min, 14% → 65%)
-
Stop 6:
Area di Servizio Stura Ovest (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de Vidauban Nord (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de Nabrigas (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Aire de Gasparets (13 min, 28% → 74%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Vila Sana (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 11:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the VW ID.7 Pro S Won
The VW ID.7 Pro S achieved a 13-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2923km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~443 kWh vs ~537 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons