In our Sofia to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 by 117 minutes, completing the 2601km route in 29h 19min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 19min (117 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 29min
- Energy: ~405 kWh
- Distance: 2601km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 |
| Travel time |
29h 19min |
31h 16min |
| Charging time: |
1h 29min |
3h 28min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~468 kWh |
~468 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 29% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
ČEZ Mikulášov sever (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle (11 min, 11% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Farø (17 min, 14% → 75%)
-
Stop 8:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
JP Putevi Srbije (27 min, 14% → 82%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (20 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (28 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Humpolec sever (22 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle (28 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 6:
hagebaumarkt (18 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Væggerløsevej (28 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Importgatan (27 min, 10% → 76%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 117-minute advantage over Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 on this 2601km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 29min vs 3h 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~405 kWh vs ~435 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons