In our Sofia to Oslo EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 65 minutes, completing the 2601km route in 29h 42min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 9 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 42min (65 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 1h 52min
- Energy: ~478 kWh
- Distance: 2601km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
29h 42min |
30h 47min |
| Charging time: |
1h 52min |
2h 56min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~468 kWh |
~468 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (13 min, 15% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (14 min, 11% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Pávov Sever (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Væggerløsevej (17 min, 11% → 74%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Tradenvägen (10 min, 14% → 58%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 57% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (25 min, 11% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (16 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 5:
Ladná směr Brno (19 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Shell (11 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 7:
Esso Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
Netto Sophie-Charlotten-Straße (13 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
Raststätte Recknitz Ost (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 10:
Burger King (10 min, 11% → 49%)
-
Stop 11:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 12:
McDonald's (14 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 13:
Tradenvägen (14 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 65-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2601km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 52min vs 2h 56min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~478 kWh vs ~582 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons