In our Sofia to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 222 minutes, completing the 2159km route in 21h 38min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 38min (222 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~352 kWh
- Distance: 2159km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
21h 38min |
25h 20min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
4h 5min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~389 kWh |
~389 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (17 min, 69% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (11 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Eisentratten (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
REWE Nymphenburger Straße (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's Adolf-Seebacher-Straße (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger IKEA (27 min, 20% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Odmorište Novska Sjever (20 min, 10% → 28%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Shell (22 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Lidl (36 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Schlosshotel Lacknerhof (20 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
eni Tankstelle Verdistraße (10 min, 10% → 19%)
-
Stop 7:
Aral Tankstelle (25 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Aral Tankstelle Karlsruher Straße (55 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (11 min, 10% → 20%)
-
Stop 10:
Aire Reims Champagne Nord (19 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 222-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 2159km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 4h 5min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~352 kWh vs ~406 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons