In our Sofia to Paris EV duel, the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 46 minutes, completing the 2156km route in 21h 16min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric
- Total time: 21h 16min (46 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~373 kWh
- Distance: 2156km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
21h 16min |
22h 2min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
1h 33min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~388 kWh |
~388 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
JP Putevi Srbije (17 min, 43% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
vaylens Genussplatzl (12 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
EnBW HyperNetz (14 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV A1 (15 min, 15% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Eisentratten (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
REWE Nymphenburger Straße (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de Keskastel Est (12 min, 11% → 51%)
-
Stop 8:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Won
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric achieved a 46-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2156km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 1h 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~373 kWh vs ~396 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons