In our Sofia to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 44 minutes, completing the 1285km route in 12h 37min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 37min (44 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 37min
- Energy: ~210 kWh
- Distance: 1285km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
12h 37min |
13h 21min |
| Charging time: |
37min |
1h 19min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~231 kWh |
~232 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 25% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (12 min, 12% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Lamačská cesta (15 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Prague
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 56% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (26 min, 12% → 82%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
ZSE Motor-Car Lamač (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
B.C.S. (13 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 44-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 1285km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 37min vs 1h 19min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~210 kWh vs ~220 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons