In our Sofia to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Skoda ENYAQ 85 by 88 minutes, completing the 2105km route in 24h 32min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 32min (88 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 29min
- Energy: ~344 kWh
- Distance: 2105km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Skoda ENYAQ 85 |
| Travel time |
24h 32min |
26h 0min |
| Charging time: |
1h 29min |
2h 47min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~379 kWh |
~381 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 25% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (12 min, 31% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (17 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (29 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Riga
Skoda ENYAQ 85 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Textile House Bulevar maršala Tolbuhina (30 min, 11% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (27 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Lotników (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP East (15 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
Lakeside (28 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Rudniki Południe (27 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 8:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (13 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 88-minute advantage over Skoda ENYAQ 85 on this 2105km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 29min vs 2h 47min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~344 kWh vs ~368 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons