In our Sofia to Riga EV duel, the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 22 minutes, completing the 2105km route in 24h 10min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric
- Total time: 24h 10min (22 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 11min
- Energy: ~364 kWh
- Distance: 2105km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric |
| Travel time |
24h 32min |
24h 10min |
| Charging time: |
1h 29min |
1h 11min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~379 kWh |
~378 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 25% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (12 min, 31% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (17 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (29 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Riga
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 37% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 26% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Centrum rekreacji i wypoczynku Hawrań (21 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Selgros Marsa (20 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Won
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric achieved a 22-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 2105km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 11min vs 1h 29min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons