In our Sofia to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the VW ID.3 Pro S 2023 by 73 minutes, completing the 2105km route in 24h 32min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 32min (73 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 29min
- Energy: ~344 kWh
- Distance: 2105km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
VW ID.3 Pro S 2023 |
| Travel time |
24h 32min |
25h 45min |
| Charging time: |
1h 29min |
2h 32min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~379 kWh |
~381 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 25% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (12 min, 31% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (17 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (29 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Riga
VW ID.3 Pro S 2023 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
JP Putevi Srbije (32 min, 16% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (13 min, 15% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland Wolkera (12 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 5:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell MOP East (11 min, 14% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Lakeside (27 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Rudniki Południe (27 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 9:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (10 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 73-minute advantage over VW ID.3 Pro S 2023 on this 2105km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 29min vs 2h 32min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~344 kWh vs ~352 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons