In our Sofia to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 by 38 minutes, completing the 2105km route in 24h 24min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 24min (38 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 21min
- Energy: ~328 kWh
- Distance: 2105km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 |
| Travel time |
24h 24min |
25h 2min |
| Charging time: |
1h 21min |
1h 51min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~379 kWh |
~379 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 29% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (10 min, 37% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (16 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (25 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Riga
XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
JP Putevi Srbije (21 min, 14% → 82%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (12 min, 46% → 85%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (20 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 5:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (25 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 6:
EMSI Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 22%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 38-minute advantage over XPENG G9 RWD Long Range 2025 on this 2105km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 21min vs 1h 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~328 kWh vs ~414 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons