In our Sofia to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the CUPRA Born 77 kWh by 65 minutes, completing the 2103km route in 25h 5min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 5min (65 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 57min
- Energy: ~377 kWh
- Distance: 2103km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
CUPRA Born 77 kWh |
| Travel time |
25h 5min |
26h 10min |
| Charging time: |
1h 57min |
2h 58min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~379 kWh |
~381 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (14 min, 13% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (19 min, 27% → 79%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP East (10 min, 15% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (20 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland (24 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 8:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Riga
CUPRA Born 77 kWh Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 60% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (29 min, 16% → 76%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (18 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland Wolkera (13 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 6:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (11 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell MOP East (15 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Lakeside (30 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 9:
MOP Rudniki Południe (28 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 10:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (13 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 65-minute advantage over CUPRA Born 77 kWh on this 2103km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 57min vs 2h 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~377 kWh vs ~384 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons