In our Sofia to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Nio ET7 100kWh by 106 minutes, completing the 1658km route in 16h 43min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 43min (106 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~271 kWh
- Distance: 1658km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Nio ET7 100kWh |
| Travel time |
16h 43min |
18h 29min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
2h 29min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~298 kWh |
~299 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (17 min, 69% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (11 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (14 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Rome
Nio ET7 100kWh Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 61% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (18 min, 17% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (31 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 32%)
-
Stop 5:
Barje Sever (11 min, 12% → 36%)
-
Stop 6:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (16 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Eni (27 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 8:
Osteria De'Giusti (11 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 9:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (15 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 106-minute advantage over Nio ET7 100kWh on this 1658km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 2h 29min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~271 kWh vs ~339 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons