In our Sofia to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 by 22 minutes, completing the 1658km route in 16h 43min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 43min (22 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~271 kWh
- Distance: 1658km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 |
| Travel time |
16h 43min |
17h 5min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
1h 19min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~298 kWh |
~301 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (17 min, 69% → 89%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (11 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (14 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Rome
XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 59% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (15 min, 16% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (11 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 5:
Lom west (Ljubljana - Koper) (10 min, 49% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (13 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 7:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 22-minute advantage over XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 on this 1658km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 1h 19min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~271 kWh vs ~316 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons