In our Sofia to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 89 minutes, completing the 1657km route in 16h 35min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 31, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 35min (89 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~258 kWh
- Distance: 1657km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
16h 35min |
18h 4min |
| Charging time: |
56min |
2h 5min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~298 kWh |
~299 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (12 min, 70% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 20% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Badia Nuova Ovest (14 min, 10% → 68%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 60% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (15 min, 15% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (27 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (18 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (18 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Autogrill Po Ovest (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
Ristorante Goyo (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (12 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 89-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1657km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 2h 5min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~258 kWh vs ~307 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons