In our Sofia to Rome EV duel, the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 beats the Audi e-tron GT by 12 minutes, completing the 1659km route in 17h 37min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
Despite costing 50,090 less, the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 beats the Audi e-tron GT by 12 minutes on this route.
The Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250
- Total time: 17h 37min (12 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 2h 5min
- Energy: ~277 kWh
- Distance: 1659km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron GT |
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 |
| Travel time |
17h 49min |
17h 37min |
| Charging time: |
1h 50min |
2h 5min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~299 kWh |
~302 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 57% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (20 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (22 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (14 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
Autogrill Po Ovest (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Ristorante Goyo (10 min, 11% → 49%)
-
Stop 8:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (10 min, 10% → 46%)
- Arrival: Rome
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 61% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (29 min, 25% → 95%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shell (24 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Duino Nord (35 min, 10% → 93%)
-
Stop 5:
Ristorante Goyo (27 min, 10% → 78%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 Won
The Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 achieved a 12-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 1659km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~277 kWh vs ~371 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons