In our Sofia to Rome EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 79 minutes, completing the 1657km route in 17h 10min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 23, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 10min (79 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 14min
- Energy: ~297 kWh
- Distance: 1657km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
17h 10min |
18h 29min |
| Charging time: |
1h 14min |
2h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~298 kWh |
~299 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV A1 (17 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (18 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 3:
Petrol (17 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Eni (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Osteria De'Giusti (12 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Rome
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (21 min, 50% → 82%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (20 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (22 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Barje Sever (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (21 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 7:
Autogrill Po Ovest (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 8:
Ristorante Goyo (14 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (13 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 79-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1657km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 14min vs 2h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~297 kWh vs ~302 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons