In our Sofia to Rome EV duel, the Kia Niro EV beats the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 by 3 minutes, completing the 1659km route in 19h 5min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55's 480km range doesn't beat the Kia Niro EV's 370km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Kia Niro EV needs only 9 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Kia Niro EV
- Total time: 19h 5min (3 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 59min
- Energy: ~287 kWh
- Distance: 1659km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 |
Kia Niro EV |
| Travel time |
19h 8min |
19h 5min |
| Charging time: |
3h 6min |
2h 59min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~299 kWh |
~300 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (19 min, 53% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (28 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (38 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 5:
Barje Sever (23 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (21 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Castel Bentivoglio Ovest (12 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 8:
Ristorante Goyo (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 9:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (15 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 10:
Giove Ovest (10 min, 10% → 35%)
- Arrival: Rome
Kia Niro EV Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (14 min, 55% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (24 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (28 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (13 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 5:
Petrol (23 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Fratta Nord (21 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (23 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 8:
Osteria De'Giusti (12 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 9:
Etrusco (21 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Kia Niro EV Won
The Kia Niro EV achieved a 3-minute advantage over Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 on this 1659km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 59min vs 3h 6min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~287 kWh vs ~366 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons