In our Sofia to Rome EV duel, the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 beats the Kia EV9 by 8 minutes, completing the 1657km route in 17h 37min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Kia EV9's 450km range doesn't beat the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250's 395km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250
- Total time: 17h 37min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 2h 5min
- Energy: ~277 kWh
- Distance: 1657km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Kia EV9 |
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 |
| Travel time |
17h 45min |
17h 37min |
| Charging time: |
1h 42min |
2h 5min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~298 kWh |
~302 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Kia EV9 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
JP Putevi Srbije (13 min, 18% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (37 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 4:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Eni (17 min, 11% → 69%)
-
Stop 6:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (13 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Rome
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 61% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (29 min, 25% → 95%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Shell (24 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Duino Nord (35 min, 10% → 93%)
-
Stop 5:
Ristorante Goyo (27 min, 10% → 78%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 Won
The Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 achieved a 8-minute advantage over Kia EV9 on this 1657km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~277 kWh vs ~350 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons