In our Sofia to Tallinn EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ by 98 minutes, completing the 2412km route in 28h 52min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 28h 52min (98 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 45min
- Energy: ~394 kWh
- Distance: 2412km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ |
| Travel time |
28h 52min |
30h 30min |
| Charging time: |
1h 45min |
3h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~434 kWh |
~434 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 25% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (12 min, 31% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (17 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (29 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Neste (17 min, 13% → 75%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
JP Putevi Srbije (29 min, 14% → 82%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (33 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 3:
OC Forum (15 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Połomskiego (29 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 5:
Lakeside (27 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Rudniki Południe (31 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 7:
Cafe Baltica (26 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 8:
Neste Niidu (13 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 98-minute advantage over Mercedes-Benz EQA 250+ on this 2412km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 45min vs 3h 23min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~394 kWh vs ~398 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons