In our Sofia to Tallinn EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the VW ID. Buzz Pro LR by 125 minutes, completing the 2409km route in 29h 19min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 9 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 19min (125 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 6min
- Energy: ~442 kWh
- Distance: 2409km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR |
| Travel time |
29h 19min |
31h 24min |
| Charging time: |
2h 6min |
4h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~434 kWh |
~434 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (13 min, 15% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (18 min, 27% → 77%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP East (10 min, 16% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (19 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland (26 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Neste (10 min, 17% → 60%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (11 min, 55% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (36 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (12 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (23 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland Wolkera (17 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (13 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell MOP East (19 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 8:
Lakeside (38 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 9:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (46 min, 10% → 89%)
-
Stop 10:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 11:
IONITY Circle K Ādaži (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 12:
IONITY Circle K (17 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 125-minute advantage over VW ID. Buzz Pro LR on this 2409km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 6min vs 4h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~442 kWh vs ~533 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons