In our Sofia to Tallinn EV duel, the BMW i5 eDrive40 beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 299 minutes, completing the 2412km route in 29h 38min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model S 2023's 505km range doesn't beat the BMW i5 eDrive40's 465km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The BMW i5 eDrive40 needs only 9 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
BMW i5 eDrive40
- Total time: 29h 38min (299 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 29min
- Energy: ~415 kWh
- Distance: 2412km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
BMW i5 eDrive40 |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
29h 38min |
34h 37min |
| Charging time: |
2h 29min |
6h 54min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~434 kWh |
~435 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
BMW i5 eDrive40 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (19 min, 11% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (17 min, 21% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Lotników (16 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP East (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (22 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (33 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 8:
Cafe Baltica (12 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Neste (10 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger IKEA (27 min, 20% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Auchan Korzó (10 min, 10% → 18%)
-
Stop 3:
Lajosmizse pihenőhely kelet (61 min, 13% → 76%)
-
Stop 4:
AquaCity (22 min, 10% → 30%)
-
Stop 5:
Moya (62 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen S7 (12 min, 10% → 21%)
-
Stop 7:
Lidl Trakt Lubelski (81 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 8:
EMSI Tankstelle (66 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 9:
Astarte Nafta (54 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 10:
Hesburger (19 min, 10% → 38%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Why the BMW i5 eDrive40 Won
The BMW i5 eDrive40 achieved a 299-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 2412km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 29min vs 6h 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~415 kWh vs ~454 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons