In our Sofia to Vienna EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range by 35 minutes, completing the 1000km route in 9h 56min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 56min (35 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 25min
- Energy: ~163 kWh
- Distance: 1000km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range |
| Travel time |
9h 56min |
10h 31min |
| Charging time: |
25min |
59min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~180 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 25% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (15 min, 12% → 71%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 56% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (26 min, 12% → 82%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (13 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 35-minute advantage over Volvo EX30 Single Motor Extended Range on this 1000km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 25min vs 59min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~163 kWh vs ~171 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons