In our Sofia to Vienna EV duel, the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric beats the Audi e-tron GT by 41 minutes, completing the 1002km route in 9h 50min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
Despite costing 34,060 less, the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric beats the Audi e-tron GT by 41 minutes on this route.
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric
- Total time: 9h 50min (41 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 20min
- Energy: ~173 kWh
- Distance: 1002km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi e-tron GT |
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric |
| Travel time |
10h 31min |
9h 50min |
| Charging time: |
58min |
20min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~180 kWh |
~179 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 57% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (25 min, 11% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (13 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Bábolna (10 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 37% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tópark (10 min, 12% → 55%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Won
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric achieved a 41-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 1002km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 20min vs 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~173 kWh vs ~224 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons